![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
41 AVENUE FONSNY - B-1060 BRUSSELS TEL. +32 2 538 29 63 - FAX +32 2 537 28 28 e-mail: fve.figgis.heather@pophost.eunet.be
PRESIDENT: Karlheing SIMON
September 1997
... and what about Communication?
All of you know about the distribution Board tasks which were decided at the meeting of May 2nd 1997 in Brussels. I am responsible for information services and contacts, newsletters and press releases, and Board links with France (curious, isn't it!), Ireland and UK.
PROBLEMS OF COMMUNICATION: a heavy task in international organisation. First of all, I must apologize and recognize that Heather Moore, our representative, in Brussels, does most of the job, and has a lot of contacts with EU organisations, FVE Sections and national delegations, etc... Many thanks to her, and congratulations!!
The problem is so huge that I have thought it was necessary to work step by step and the first step should be INTERNAL COMMUNICATION and particularly the newsletters.
I feel, and hope that you do too, that the newsletter is a good tool for internal communication; I thought it was necessary to organize it around some principles of communication.
COMMUNICATION WORKS INTERACTIVELY: the emitter must be the receiver and the receiver must be emitter. In our Federation, it means obviously that the Board must give information to the members (Sections, and national organisations) and that these members must participate and give back some information of interest for the Board or for other members.
BUT WHAT SORT OF INFORMATION must we exchange?
An editorial of the President or an other member of the Board seems necessary to up-date the policy of the Board about questions of current interest.
The Board has already expressed its aim of transparency, so you will find activities of its members or representatives, and some abastracts about them.
Another heading would be about EU new:
That's how we shall try to prepare every three months a FVE newsletter.
REMEMBER!
Yours sincerely,
SECRETARY GENERAL
VICE PRESIDENT
VICE PRESIDENT
VICE PRESIDENT
PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE
EUROPEAN NEWS
THE EUROPEAN UNION'S PRE-ACCESSION STRATEGY FOR THE ASSOCIATED COUNTRIES OF CENTRAL EUROPE
The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 led to unprecedented political and economic changes in the Central Eastem European Countries (CEECs). The European Union provided them with political and financial support during this period of change, and quickly realised that in order to ensure the prosperity and stability of Europe, the CEECs should strive to become members of the EU.
Consequently, one of the Commission's on-going priorities is the EU preaccession strategy; the Commission believes that a well-designed strategy will lead to successful integration.
During the 1993 Copenhagen summit, Ministers agreed that "the associated countries of central Europe that so desire shall become members of the European Union, as soon as they are able to assume to obligations of membership", and a commitment was made to those countries in central Europe with the signing of Europe Agreements.
Economic and political conditions for membership were defined, and the following requirements were laid down:
The EU gave support to the CEECs in light of their future accession, and drew up a pre-accession strategy, which included a "structured dialogue" between the Associated Countries and the EU institutions, the aim of which was to encourage mutual trust, and a framework for addressing topics of common interest; a White Paper on the subject was drawn up. It was agreed that Phare would provide financial support for the promotion of integration with the Associated Countries through the development of infra-structure, cooperation in those fields with a trans-European dimension, and through the promotion of integration.
The European Union's main task is to absorb the Associated Countries into its structure without changing its established purposes and goals. Therefore the gaps between the Associated Countries and EU countries' political and economic structures must be narrowed. The Commission's support for the Associated Countries has been realised in several ways:
At the last meeting of Codex Alimentarius, the European Commission faced a proposition from the USA to forbid raw milk cheeses. The debate about a compulsory pasteurisation of cheeses had been postponed until 1999.
At last the decision of the Commission about materials which present risks in regard of ESST has been adopted:
The last Newsletter contained a summary of the Communication of the Commission on Consumer Health and Food Safety in which the reorganisation of the scientific committees was announced. The recent decision of the Commission of 23 July sets up the different new committees. Through Commission Decision 94/404/EEC, a scientific director committee was set up which will be responsible for coordination.
The Scientific Committee of Medicinal Products and Medical Devices is also responsible for veterinary medicines. The Scientific Veterinary Committee is divided in two: Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare and the Scientific Committee on Veterinary Measures relating to Public Health. This last committee shares competencies with the Scientific Committee on Food. The committee on toxicity and ecotoxicity has become the Scientific Committee on Toxicity and Ecotoxicity and the Environment. The pesticides committee has become the Scientific Committee on Plants. All these committees will have a maximum of nineteen members, nominated, for a once renewable mandate of three years, through a public procedure. There is an emphasis on the independency of experts.
The role of the committees is to:
New Committees:
MEETINGS ATTENDED BY FVE REPRESENTATIVES: FULL MINUTES AVAILABLE FROM FVE UPON REQUEST
The Sectional Presidents joined the Board for their deliberations and the selection of the Executive Director. The meeting also concentrated on:
Full minutes will be circulated following the meeting on 11.10.97.
40 applications were received. Five applicants were interviewed b the Board and Sectional Representatives. After lengthy considerations, one candidate offered the post. The Board is awaiting the candidate's reply. If the General Assembly accepts the principle of employing an Executive Director (ED) then the candidate selected by the Board, the ED would commence work at the FVE in January 1998.
TAIEX = technical information exchange office (information brochure available). TAIEX was set up at the beginning of 1996 and its monies emanate from PHARE. The Contact person is Mr Darling formerly of DG VI, who now reports to DG IA and DG XV. He telephoned Heather Moore, expressing an interest in offering 100% funding for a conference, for the Associated Countries, and put forward the idea of holding a conference on the Role of the Official Veterinarian in the Associated Countries*, indicating that Budapest would be appropriate.
The two-day meeting would close with a Roundtable discussion. Full agendas have been sent to the FVE Observer delegations: FVE Member delegations will receive them in due course.
Conceming the organisation:
*Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, Romania and Bulgaria.
UEVP Board Meeting 5-6 July 1997
The first Board meeting of the newly elected Board was held in Copenhagen 5-6 July 1997. The main item was to revise the priority list and allocate the tasks for approval at the next General Assembly meeting. The priorities were listed in accordance with the amount of work to be undertaken by the Board:
FRANCE: VP C Mir
The appellation of the current Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries does not mention food. But Louis Lepensec, the new Minister declared in front of the Directeurs Departementaux des Services Veterinaires, July 10th:
"Certes le mot alimentation a été supprimé dans le titre du Ministere. Cela n'empêchera pas l'alimentation elle-même de rester au coeur de mes préoccupations: la sécurité alimentaire notamment est une de mes priorités.
Moreover, on 28.8.97, Lionel Jospin, Prime Minster, decided to create two agencies, one for the safety of medical products (medicines, protheses, blood etc) and another for the safety of food. The extent of the prerogatives of these agencies has not yet been decided.
UK RCVS: A Samuelson FOOD STANDARDS AGENCY
The change is Government (from Conservative to Labour) in May 1997 has brought with it many new ideas. One of the most notable, presented during the first week of the new Government, is that of a Food Standards Agency. Professor Philip James, Director of the Rowett Research Institute, was commissioned by the Labour Party to draw up proposals for a Food Standards Agency ensuring the safety of food from "plough to plate".
The intention is to bring all areas related to food safety and nutrition under one agency. Views on the proposals have been sought and draft legislation is expected early next year. Both RCVS and BVA have been keen to highlight the important role played by veterinarians in the field of food safety. The Government's attention has been drawn to the FVE's "Stable to Table" paper and the various EU initiatives.
DEREGULATION
The final report of the Deregulation Working Party entitled "Deregulation: Implications for Animal Welfare, Consumer Protection and the Veterinary Surgeons' Act" was approved by RCVS Council in November 1996. The report took 18 months to complete and all the main bodies and associations within the profession were consulted.
The report assesses the range of pressures facing the veterinary profession from Government, lay persons and the profession itself to "deregulate" certain acts of veterinary surgery. The key part of the report clarifies the definition of an act of veterinary surgery and sets out the criteria which must be met before the deregulation of such acts can be considered and agreed.
RCVS is currently in discussion with Government to introduce new legislation as soon as possible.
Delegations are requested to send contributions for the Newsletter to FVE before 31.12.97
|